#Call of the sea explained how to#
#Call of the sea explained movie#

Instead, Lee says, “So you can come visit some time.” And continues on to say that if Patrick wants to go to college in Boston, he could stay with Lee, or at least stay there if he wants to come look at colleges, etc. Our expectation is that Lee, per usual, will shut down. This is an act of disconnection, completely in line with what we’ve seen from Lee. Instead of answering, Lee turns his head away. Being open and vulnerable has been more than difficult-at times it’s been impossible. Social interaction has been his biggest failure. We’ve seen him do this a thousand times throughout the movie. It’s like the words are caught in his throat.

#Call of the sea explained how to#

His expression says, “Really? Are you really going to make me say it?” But Lee doesn’t know how to say it. He goes from looking at the ground to giving a quick look at Patrick. To this, Patrick asks, “What for?” And here is the key moment.Īt the question from Patrick’s, we see Lee shut his mouth. The implication is that it would be a second bedroom. He mentions he’s looking for one with an extra room, for a pull-out sofa or something. While walking on the road, after Patrick’s dad’s funeral, Lee tells Patrick about looking for a new apartment. Now that we have that out of the way, let’s get into the first scene. Manchester-by-the-Sea is an implication-heavy film. Implication heavy films are great for people who want to actively engage with the film and enjoy the puzzle-like experience of “solving” the movie. You can watch 2001: a Spacey Odyssey two-thousand and one times and still not know what’s going on.ĭirect statement films are great for people who just want to have a passive viewing experience. Where Stanley Kubrick relies heavily on implication. You don’t watch Schindler’s List and miss what it’s about. Like Steven Spielberg relies heavily on direct statement. But using one over the other creates a very different viewing experience. One isn’t necessarily better than another. To do that, we have to look for evidence within the movie, build up a hypothesis, find evidence that supports that hypothesis, then talk about it with other people.īoth are tools. It’s up to us, the viewers, to actively figure out what we think that implication means. But the entire film is designed in a way as to imply a confrontation between the two. Again, there’s no direct statement about Religion and Business. We see them manipulate each other, humiliate each other, and one ultimately kills the other. But the film puts a business man and a man of religion in opposition of one another. No character gives a speech about business and religion. Watch There Will Be Blood and there’s no direct statement about business versus religion. This is what Simba’s done wrong, this is why he’s dong it, this is what he has to do to make it right.

In The Lion King we have the ghost of Mufasa straight up tell Simba, “You have forgotten who you are.” Everything is laid out.

#Call of the sea explained movie#

Which is essentially the difference between a Disney movie and a Paul Thomas Anderson movie. You’re worried about implication versus direct statement. You’re not worried about “scene” versus “summary”. That’s it.” Then only real use of summary/telling in the macro sense is when we get a montage. By the end of the movie, he’s a little less scared. This guy has to go and take care of his nephew, but doesn’t want to because he’s scared. “There’s a guy who’s sad because he accidentally killed his kids. Otherwise, Manchester-by-the-Sea could have been one minute long. This would demonstrate the difference between what the North was fighting for and what the South was fighting for.Įvery narrative film shows us a story rather than tells us a story. While some Confederates would be more villainous. Some Union soldiers would be valorous and give speeches about equality and the end of slavery. I would write thousands of words just to show you how bloody and violent and sad the Civil War was, and why the two sides were fighting. What could they speak about other than what the morning would bring? Tomorrow would be the first day of the battle of Gettysburg…” and on and on and on. Even though only a few slept, no one spoke. Listening to the canvas tents flap and crack, reminding them of gun shots. Of the thousands and thousands of men laying upon the ground, how many had slept? Cold as they were. It’s scene if I were to write, “All throughout the night, strong, chill winds had passed through the camp. It also revealed a lot about the value systems of the citizenry and government.” It’s summary if I say, “The US Civil War resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans. The macro scope can be summed up as “scene” versus “summary”. “Showing versus telling” is interesting to discuss because it has two different scopes.